Editorial standardVersion 1.0

How we know
what we know.

A transparent framework for research, cultural context, uncertainty, citations, corrections, and responsible storytelling.

Read the standard ↓
Evidence before claims.
Context before certainty.

DivineGrains is an educational atlas, not a substitute for specialist medical, nutritional, agricultural, or legal advice. We avoid hype, separate fact from interpretation, and never turn a nutrient observation into a promise of treatment or cure.

View source hierarchy ↓

From question
to living record.

01

Research

Gather botanical, archaeological, agricultural, linguistic, foodways, and nutrition evidence.

02

Verify

Cross-check dates, names, ranges, translations, and claims against suitable primary or authoritative sources.

03

Structure

Separate established evidence, interpretation, living tradition, and uncertainty before drafting.

04

Review

Check clarity, cultural framing, attribution, accessibility, internal links, and every reference.

05

Publish

Release a dated profile with visible sources, careful language, and a path for future correction.

06

Revisit

Update records as evidence develops and document meaningful changes to published understanding.

Certainty is
not a costume.

Dates of domestication, routes of movement, and origins of names are often reconstructed from incomplete evidence. Our language should show the strength and limits of what is known.

01

Established

Supported by converging authoritative evidence; stated directly and cited.

02

Probable

The best current interpretation, with qualifying language and the basis made visible.

03

Debated

Credible sources disagree or the material record is incomplete; competing views are acknowledged.

04

Living knowledge

A community practice, name, memory, or tradition attributed to its cultural and geographic context.

Authority,
fit, and traceability.

  1. Primary research and material evidencePeer-reviewed archaeology, archaeobotany, genetics, agronomy, ethnography, and original datasets.
  2. Authoritative reference bodiesRecognized botanical databases, universities, museums, public-health agencies, and international agricultural institutions.
  3. Community and cultural sourcesNamed custodians, language authorities, oral histories, and locally grounded scholarship, attributed with care.
  4. Secondary synthesisHigh-quality reviews and reference works used to orient a question and identify primary evidence—not to conceal uncertainty.

People are not
footnotes.

Food heritage belongs within living communities, not outside them. We name cultures and places precisely, avoid presenting a region as culturally uniform, distinguish an international label from local names, and attribute practices instead of claiming them as anonymous tradition.

A living atlas
must be revisable.

New evidence can refine dates, taxonomy, geographic ranges, and interpretation. Material corrections should be reviewed, sourced, and reflected in the record. Every profile is a publication milestone—not a claim to finality.

Continue exploring

Put the standard
beside the stories.

Browse all grain profiles →Why DivineGrains exists →Explore the world atlas →